לקוטי שיחות חלק ב׳ - בלק א

In discussing the difference between Moav and Amalek, it is important to note how each related to Bnei Yisrael. Moav’s fear was primarily a physical one; they were afraid of being overpowered and thus focused on cursing Israel through Bilam. Conversely, Amalek’s hatred was purely spiritual, their attack against Bnei Yisrael was said to be baseless and irrational. This indicates two distinct forms of opposition: Moav's being logical and practical, while Amalek's represents a deep-seated hostility to the essence of holiness present in Yisrael.

This fundamental difference also impacts the approach Israel took with each nation. With Moav, diplomacy and certain compromises were permissible to prevent conflict; however, with Amalek, there is no room for compromise as they represent evil that must be eradicated entirely.

The Rebbe further highlights the way Torah describes these confrontations: emphasizing Yerushalayim when referencing Amalek and Bethel when describing interactions with Moav. These symbolize different methods in dealing with threats; Bethel implies an approach of placation where possible threats are mitigated through understanding. In contrast, Yerushalayim symbolizes steadfastness against adversities that cannot be rationalized away.

The message concludes by advising how these concepts apply on an individual level today. Each person has aspects within themselves akin to Moav—challenges which require strategic planning and diplomacy—while also confronting Amalek-like traits reflecting inner conflicts that demand unwavering resistance to overcome completely.