6088 - The Placement of Chassidic Discourses in Prayer

4th of Adar, 5718 | Brooklyn, N.Y.

To the Rav, the Chassid, and Elder: Moreinu Nachum שיחי' Chanun, Jerusalem.

Shalom u'Veracha:

Your Pidyon Nefesh (redemption of the soul) has been received. I will read it at an auspicious time at the holy resting place (Tziyun) of my father-in-law, the Rebbe [Rayatz], for a blessing.

I am responding to the question you asked on behalf of the synagogue Gabbai regarding the proper time to study or recite a Ma'amar (Chassidic discourse) on Friday night—specifically, whether it may be done between the prayer of Kegavna and the start of Ma’ariv.

As for the tradition in Lubavitch: When a Ma’ariv was delivered during the Kabbalat Shabbat service, the interruption was made between the chapter of Mizmor Shir L’Yom HaShabbat and Kegavna. In other words, they would complete the Psalm, deliver the discourse, and only then begin Kegavna. They did not interrupt between Kegavna and Ma’ariv.

However, regarding the unique and specific customs of the Chassidic community (Anash) in Jerusalem, you should consult with the local elders to determine how it was traditionally practiced there. One should follow the established tradition of their specific location.

With honor and blessing, (On behalf of the Rebbe's Secretariat)

Summary

The Rebbe distinguishes between Halacha (the letter of the law) and Minhag (tradition):

1. The Lubavitch Standard: Traditionally, the Ma’amar acts as a preparation for the inner spiritual dimensions of prayer represented by Kegavna. Therefore, it is placed before that prayer, not as an interruption after it has begun.

2. Respect for Local Custom: The Rebbe demonstrates a high degree of respect for the "Elders of Jerusalem." By instructing the questioner to seek out local tradition, the Rebbe implies that while the Lubavitch way is the standard, local Chassidic history carries its own weight and should not be discarded without cause.

3. Halachic vs. Traditional: Because the Rebbe directs them to "find out how it was done" rather than issuing a strict prohibition, it indicates that the issue is primarily one of sacred tradition and the proper flow of prayer rather than a strict halachic violation of hefsek (interruption).